Skip to main content

Notes from creative journey: “The thinking behind design”

  I begin again to write after a long time of silence and after I have kept at a safe distance the world of writing. It’s not easy to return on one’s steps, especially if you are a visual creative who uses the writing for the necessary to explain the own projects.  It’s hard to explain to people who read you, the reasons which take you to open a publication on web, it’s hard to not think how you can make known the arguments each time you will discuss if you know these arguments are not common but there are few people interested them.  I think the first post must be a preface on what we would like write in the following posts. It must represent our imaginary line on which to pin down the topics we would like to talk about, a reference for all those times we lose sight the pourpose for which to write, a note to be read every time it’s missing the reasons to continue, an engagement to be revise to the need to reorganize own work in a new viewpoint and under new scenary....

Cybersecurity: "The return of the procedure"

 

I’m here to write again of cybersecurity in a different point of view from the vision of other people can imagine. 

Many persons asked me to talk about cybersecurity in a special session but for me it’s impossible. 

In my experience of design contests, also online, I have learnt that the consolidated procedures exist and they belong to security and legal section than creativity. An example are the contests for industrial design where is obligatory that the project: 

  1. doesn’t infringe the patents and copyright of others, 
  2. didn’t publish, 
  3. it remains unpublished until the exit of results and sometimes until the option of acquisition from the promoter of contest. 

So happen either the contest platform or contest organization or candidates have to put in operation the procedures to prevent flight of news or other problems on projects before the exit of results. I can say that the iter doesn’t belong to creativity but meet the discourse of defence of company and personal assets. 

One of common operation from candidate in contests is to evade the infringement of patent and copyright of others. In the course of development it’s necessary to verify the patent and copyright already registered from others in the right session further the registration of own patent for own works. 

What happen if the machine of contest procedures is blocked? 

In the unfortunate event the project is published before the exit of results or there are obstacles of other nature as the infringement of patent there is the answer doesn’t like to hear: EXCLUSION

The conversation can be diluted and extremely tedious but can be interesting for many aspects similar to the procedures for contracts and subcontracts. 

In a legal circuit none has interest to be excluded or elude the rules, unfortunately in some cases we assist to surpass the contests or contracts in non legal way. 

An example for projectal contests: in the contest commission there couldn't be people who know the candidates for a question of  impartiality. 

With a contest commission known the candidates shouldn't partecipate to raise doubts, while in a commission unknown there are many problems. The board member can opt to renounce only in the case it know the presence of candidates known but not in the case they are anonymous so the contest organization have to verify there aren’t members in commmission and candidates they known themself. 

We can see some example. 

  1. If we have a student contest is obvious in the commission there will not be teachers can know them. 
  2. It can happen that a board member and a candidate partecipated in the same public event and so they know themself each other. 

It’s obvious in these two cases that if the contest organization has problems also after the exit of results if cannot verify. Also in this case it can be the exclusion of candidate either some persons from external raise the question or the contest organization decide to protect its company asset. 

In the procedure of contract assigniment the problem rises in the case to bear market in the gare further others aspects of the gare can be similar to projectal contests. 

The bear market had always raise problem because if they are more low there are doubts on the sostenibility of prices in comparison with standard price of construction and management and there could be various illegal behaviour. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Creative and security information specialist: the indipendence is a imperfect world of freedom

  I was hoping don’t write again a critical post on some arguments because this publication is born with a different purpose, but the persistence of events not related to my will oblige me to write again a critical post. The indipendence and the freedom of thinking taught me by my parents, in south of Italy they often clashed with events didn’t depend from my will but from the circumstances where the diversity and the creativity aren’t view as an added value that can innovate a process for the improvement of society.  Before me, many independent creatives and ethical hackers have talk about this subject, I could have to refrain to speak but I’m a creative coder and sometimes I don’t accept the interference of some people that aren’t in the sector of creativity and computing.  Many people define itself “creative”or “security information specialist”, also when it’s not so.  A client call a physician, a lawyer or an accountant because you need of that professional worke...

Notes from creative journey: “The thinking behind design”

  I begin again to write after a long time of silence and after I have kept at a safe distance the world of writing. It’s not easy to return on one’s steps, especially if you are a visual creative who uses the writing for the necessary to explain the own projects.  It’s hard to explain to people who read you, the reasons which take you to open a publication on web, it’s hard to not think how you can make known the arguments each time you will discuss if you know these arguments are not common but there are few people interested them.  I think the first post must be a preface on what we would like write in the following posts. It must represent our imaginary line on which to pin down the topics we would like to talk about, a reference for all those times we lose sight the pourpose for which to write, a note to be read every time it’s missing the reasons to continue, an engagement to be revise to the need to reorganize own work in a new viewpoint and under new scenary....

From concept design to reality: from fractals to design

  The accomplishment of a concept goes across a long way of many phase until the arrive of the product design to market where a client can buy it and the company can verify if the product collects the consent and the expetation of clients.  If a design competition represents a way to see a great deal of possible concept or not, the accomplishment of a marketable concept is rather different. In architecture it's known before of a preliminary project there is an important step that it's to have a committment and a real demand of the architectural project respondent to the necessity of a service for city or people.  In the design it's seems similar but the planning of an object is tied to the possible industrial production and if there isn't the market or clients for that product it's useles to begin a path for the concept design to the realized product.  To plan, any object or in any scale, it's a complex operation. It supposes a synthesis of function, technique, ...