Skip to main content

Notes from creative journey: “The Thinking Behind”

I begin again to write after a long time of silence and after I have kept at a safe distance the world of writing. It’s not easy to return on one’s steps, especially if you are a visual creative who uses the writing for the necessary to explain the own projects.


It’s hard to explain to people who read you, the reasons which take you to open a publication on web, it’s hard to not think how you can make known the arguments each time you will discuss if you know these arguments are not common but there are few people interested them.


I think the first post must be a preface on what we would like write in the following posts. It must represent our imaginary line on which to pin down the topics we would like to talk about, a reference for all those times we lose sight the pourpose for which to write, a note to be read every time it’s missing the reasons to continue, an engagement to be revise to the need to reorganize own work in a new viewpoint and under new scenary.

I have always asserted that creative professional have to combine a portfolio of their works with a space where they explain their artworks, not a backstage but rather than a space where they speach about the thinking behind their works, an explanation of the way and the philosophy that lead them to realize that kind of work. Here the motives for the name of my publication “The Thinking Behind Design”.

Begin again to write will be for me an adventure, as for me it was an adventure begin a path into digital arts in 2011, after I have choosen to move away me for disappointment the idea design competitions and the personnel selections by recruiters, architectural studios, information companies and design companies so to create something new and different.

I didn’t know where this course would take me but I was aware of a new path as independent because indipendence is as imagination and it takes you in journey that others will never dream to cross and from which cannot go back but only go come on.

The fundamental principle that has accompanied me in recent years has been to turn to innovation in the forms and in the creative process because without innovation and experimentation we don’t go far but we remain in old knowledge also if we know that we would to respect tradition but it’s necessary to review it, to disanchor it from present and from a common point of view that still claims to remain tied to something known rather than investing in a new thinking and operating.

Woman in the creative sector, atypical coder with a passion for new technologies and information security, a background in STEM education often I find peoples that don’t understand my visual works which lives of interdisciplinarity and new technologies. My artworks are mainly abstract and often the introduction of work doesn’t enough to explain what you create. Many people love traditional arts, the digital arts aren’t considered art and if your works are in non ordinary sector of digital arts you don’t find people who support you on the contrary you have to fight the double to obtain the right recognition for your work.

The need to be concise in the explanation to leave space for the visual part of work doesn’t allow you to explain what is behind the artistic choise, the reasons which take you to create that kind of works rather than another kind of work, the path takes you to realize the work.

The creative thinking is a complex thinking, sometimes it requires moments of reflection and revision, moments which take you again on works archived as not realizable that can be revised in new scenarios and new perspectives after you have added new knowledges at your background.

Here is the space where I will explain all the things you don’t feel from images, the choise and the motivations to realize some works.

I will not explain the tecniques but the deep motive of my works.

I will not have a specific calendar to follow for posts and sometimes probably I will speach about other arguments away from this preface. The critical thinking, that has take me to change something of my life and has take me to work in the digital arts as indipendent, is the mainly reason of my works in these years. Then it will be useful to read again this preface, it will be useful to remember the promise to talk about some arguments and to review the imaginary line drawn so not to distract me too much.

DEDICATION: This publication is dedicated to the only two people who have always supported in my life choises despite everything and everyone and from whom I have learned the most important thing: the value of freedom choise, autonomy of thinking, meritocrazy, respect of principles and people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Urban landscapes between staticism and dynamism

At present in architecture in Italy it’s necessary decision making that in the existing istitutions and clients quite missing.   In the new area of expansion of our cities in the twentieth century to resolve the crisis of accomodations post war and post worker emigration it’s arrived yet another quantity of low quality architectures leaving the usual unsolved puzzle of expansions. In the current suburbs it’s evident the problem of urban renewal together the creation of service for citizen not still available. The designers often prefer get caged in overcome discussions rather than deal with problems of real requests of society or prefer don’t decide on development path deal for major questions rather than delude the ranks of supporters accumulated in the time. In our society with age-old story, designers prefer to talk about troublesome accademic discussion as the identity of italian architecture rather than modern style. This isn’t identity but staticism whether these discussions have

Fractal patterns and singularity: unicum and continuum, iteration and interaction.

When I met fractals and fractal art, what aroused my interest were fractal patterns with their forms and geometric structure. These graphic elements are suitable for studies on pattern in architecture and in industrial design and they have the feature of being creative pattern very artistic and useful for digital art and drawing fabric in the fashion design. Their compositional relations, the way the form is repeated, and specially that patterns in which there are singolarity have been the object of my studies for many years before arriving at deconstructivism on digital images and in generative art. The most interesting aspect of the fractal patterns are the variation of structure for the overlap of different structures, the iteration and interaction of the structures between them, or the optical effect of light and colors on the structures. Among all fractal patterns my interests are focused on patterns have deformation points and show a graphic singularity or discontinuity in the st

Fractal art and generative art: caos and order between forms and colors

When we speak about art, all of you consider classical sectors as painting, sculpture, photography and cinema without thinking that also in the programming and in the math there is the development of new artistic paths in line with the graphics and the digital art. They suppose a background of knowledge more extensive lied to mathematical algorithms and complex computer programming. If the experience in the fractal art allowed me to extend the artistic and mathematical competences, the generative art allowed me to put in practice this competences from the point of view of programming in a different way and in relation with digital graphics. The common vision of both arts is in the fractal formulas on which is based the study of dinamic systems, in both cases we find the caos in the algorithms and only the designer decides how sets order. The fractals are geometric object with the character of auto-similarity as defined from the chaos theory and are described as recursive algorithms whi